In this new Sunday morning segment, two of our authors clash in an epic standoff for the ages. Solid feelings and insane exaggeration are welcome (so don’t hesitate to participate with the fun in the comments segment beneath). Also, remember to tell us which watches you’d prefer to see destroyed/gushingly lifted up one week from now. We’ll attempt to include as large numbers of our perusers’ decisions as we can. This week it’s the turn of the Patek Philippe Nautilus. Let fight commence.

Rob Nudds

I was a sluggish believer to the Patek Philippe Nautilus. For quite a long time, I simply didn’t get it. The chaos encompassing this bizarre peculiarity in the brand’s list? Why? On the off chance that I needed a steel sports watch, I’d go to a brand known for steel sports watches, correct? Give me a Sub, a Seamaster, or, all the more as of late, a Pelagos. At the point when I thought Patek, I thought Calatrava. I didn’t adore that model either, however at any rate it sounded good to me. On a stormy day in Leicester, that all changed.

I’d been visiting the area to visit Rob Stewart of Stewart’s watches on Allandale street. Loot’s store stocks a combination of new and pre-cherished pieces, for the most part from more modest religion brands, however he has an expansive client base with a significantly more extensive field of interest, and they frequently exchange their old works of art for something new and outside of what might be expected. That implied you were similarly prone to discover a vintage Jaeger-LeCoultre in plain view just like a case new Mondaine. What it additionally implied was that his customers’ wrists were no aliens to some intense candy indeed.

Given that one commonly gets individuals when standing together, it’s uncommon for the main thing you notice about somebody – in any event, for watch maniacs like us – to be their wristwatch. Yet, I’d been plunking down when this specific noble man entered the store. Permitting Rob to get it done without interference, I’d busied myself checking a disposed of leaflet when the splendid store lights got the profound marine blue of the Patek Philippe Nautilus and, hence, my consideration. That was the second that made a huge difference (with the exception of, lamentably, my bank balance). From that point forward, I’ve been a devoted appreciator of the reach. I include my top picks inside the assortment, however I’ll battle like the devil to shield the gathering altogether. So bring your best. You’re going to require it.

Mike Stockton

My goodness, that was an unending exchange about visiting Rod Stewart. To be perfectly honest, I enjoyed him better doing “Da ya think I’m sexy.” But genuinely, with regards to the Nautilus, it’s less disliking it consistently, it’s more about really despising what it’s become.

I can review going to the Galleria Mall in Fort Lauderdale with my Dad and we flew into Mayor’s while my Mom was off looking for something and he looked at a pure Patek Philippe Nautilus. In any case, this was before individuals “had to have” Jumbo (they had one of those (or more) prepared available to be purchased during that time too) and he took a gander at the typical model, which was and is a truly wearable 37.5mm (ahem, practically equivalent to each 36mm Rolex model that each man wore up until that company began super-estimating things).

I imagined that was a truly alluring model, however this was in the ’90s and it was at that point near or more than $10K so it was an off limits. Afterward, when my Dad purchased a comparative time IWC Ingenieur, he began to converse with me about Genta and I came to value the various plans from the period. Things being what they are, up until now, you’re imagining that we’re on a similar side, correct? Indeed, you’re probably as off-base as blending prepared beans with your eggs.

Rob: I like heated beans and eggs.

Mike: You’re wiped out, yet I trust you at any rate go with some dark pudding to get back on the correct side of things.

Rob: I’m European.

Mike: Typical. A Nautilus darling rationalizing their bizarre inclinations. I discover the Patek Philippe Nautilus to be the perfect example for this fixation of accumulating and driving costs up on certain supposed “hard to find” treated steel sports watches. Need to converse with me about costly vintage Patek Nautilus pieces? I generally approve of that…something old that’s not, at this point underway has an extraordinariness that can be estimated generally. Yet, the way that the Nautilus drives a crowd of different watches like the Royal Oak and any number or Rolex steel pieces in the “I’ve got it and can sell it for double” classification simply nauseates me. Regardless of whether it’s the foul influencers who boast about them on Instagram in an hourly leased Lambo while wearing some over-marked “pick a designer” tracksuit, it really makes me need to go purchase comic books.

Rob: We’re not all like that. I don’t even own a tracksuit…

Mike: And then there are the authorities wearing them with their popped-neckline polo shirts, “bespoke” collab loafers, and vintage mixed drinks. Lastly, you have the scum bucket vendors who love to express that they have a “great deal” for you basically on the grounds that they have one in stock. Forget about it! Presently, you’re going to say, that’s not the watch’s fault.

Rob: You read my mind…

Mike: But it is! Since a brand really delivers these things and keeping in mind that an industrialist, for example, myself may say that this sort of interest is something worth being thankful for, nothing keeps going forever. Recall the Panerai flood? (what’s more, that’s no slight on Panerai…good that they made their watches accessible). Be that as it may, this bogus extraordinariness is poop and it draws out the most noticeably terrible in individuals. What’s more, don’t even kick me off on that Aquanuat…that’s an entire other conversation. On the off chance that you’re searching for a well off man’s life of recreation dressy games watch, go snatch one of those new Bulgari Octo Finissimo models all things being equal. I’d give them my cash absolutely out of guideline. Incidentally, “have I disclosed to you recently that I love you?”

Rob: I still can’t jump aboard with it being the watch’s deficiency. As far as I might be concerned, it seems like you’re saying that the moment a specific model becomes a superficial point of interest and, unavoidably, possessed by a few, will we say “less-than-charming” people that it stops to be a decent watch. Furthermore, I get that the relationship with these “less-than-charming” clients puts you off purchasing and wearing the Nautilus yourself, however I would have believed that would make you dismal, not mad. 

I live in a little air pocket inside my head a great deal of the time. I like watches since I like watches, not on the grounds that anybody advised me to, or on the grounds that I like what it says about me to others (an incredible inverse, really —  I regularly feel somewhat timid about wearing a watch worth a few thousand euros when I’m down the Working Men’s Club supping hand crafted lager at £2.35 a 16 ounces). Thus I don’t want a Nautilus in view of something besides the reality it is something alluring. I think it is excellent. I would likely drive a Lambo as well if you’ve at any point made one kick around, however not on the grounds that others would think I’m cool/rich/fruitful/stirred by fluorescent tones and awful ground freedom. However, essentially on the grounds that, similar to the Nautilus, it does what it’s expected to do extremely well. Also, I like stuff that way. Does that make me an awful individual, Mike? Does it?

Mike:  Rob, it doesn’t make you a terrible individual and perhaps I’m an awful individual. Stand by, no, I’m a decent individual and, by the way…I’ve been to the Working Men’s Club in B’ham and the guys were all drinking Bud! I was the person drinking Old Speckled Hen off the container, yet I digress…

Yeah, as far as I might be concerned, there are simply such countless extraordinary watches on the planet that I’d just rather not right now partner myself with the latest thing of overindulgence and promotion that I believe will undoubtedly break. What’s more, as referenced, I see the Patek Philippe Nautilus as a, if not “the”, perfect example of such movement. Then again, you expressed that you’d cheerfully drive a Lambo on the off chance that one were inactively lounging near and I guess I’d rock a Nautilus if the breeze were removed from its sails. It is a gorgeous watch that’s very much made (and here’s a mystery – I like it better than the Royal Oak in light of the fact that the wristband isn’t an incredible hair remover) and accommodates my wrist. I actually think we’re one great financial snap (or a bounce back in loan costs) away from seeing things standardize again and afterward maybe I’d rock one of these.

Until this occurs, I’m not saying “Tonight’s the Night” except if I discover one at retail or at a discount.  If nothing else, you can at any rate concur that my incorporation of “Rod the Mod” melody titles is in any event worth something.  And one final thing… I’m no Patek hater either, however my watch would be the Calatrava 5196P.  I’d rock that with flip slumps and shorts throughout the day, consistently and twice on Sundays.

Patek Philippe Nautilus

    Patek Philippe Nautilus