It’s been close to year and a half since I have claimed my  Grand Seiko Spring Drive Chronograph SBGC001 – in my psyche sufficiently long to make me need to compose what I had just arranged when I got the watch: a long-term review. I have composed a tribute of a review to the watch here and I have additionally composed what I accept to be the most comprehensive article online on the set of experiences and working of the Seiko Spring Drive development here . Those two together amount to more than 7,000 words and on the grounds that I have worked such a huge amount on those two posts, I’ll do all in my capacity to not rehash a lot of what I have said there. Or maybe, I urge you to click over, read both and come back to this long-term review, for we won’t cover an excessive number of the basics.

The purpose of a review is to invest enough energy with a watch to sort out its niggles, aces, and cons in regular wearability, etc. All things considered, the purpose of a long-term review like this one is to glance back at the discoveries of the first review and perceive how enduring the positives and negatives talked about there have demonstrated to be in the (exceptionally) long run.


Let me start on a note of a somewhat close to home nature, something one can just find with incredible sureness with the assistance of a watch fitted with a metal arm band. Come the mid year of 2018 (the second summer that I have had the watch) I understood that my wrist has extended from its measly 6.75″ to around 7″ in distance across, possibly more – enough to justify going from the 2nd right to the last, fourth miniature change opening in the side of the catch. No doubt, I know, I am so prepared for my toga virilis now. This goes past the standard, every day development of the wrist or the impacts of summer heat – now I’m as often as possible viewing the watch as too close even on this loosest setting and should add another a large portion of a connection to it, where a year prior on the looser settings it wobbled intolerably.

I’m sharing this bit of authentic and regularly unimportant data to state that the SBGC001, a considerable watch at 43.5mm wide and 16.1mm thick, presently the two looks and feels preferred on my wrist over it actually has (aside from those minutes when the entire thing is excessively close). At the point when individuals, even bad-to-the-bone watch darlings, see this watch on the wrist unexpectedly, a portion of their most common first inquiries are about the pushers and some badly educated comment, for example, “wow those pushers should be uncomfortable.”

I have devoted a different passage to this issue in the review and I vowed not to rehash myself here – thus I won’t. Long story short, I have not experienced one single event throughout the most recent year and a half when I discovered the pushers or the crown to delve into my wrist. Most Panerais need 18 minutes for that to occur, not year and a half, so it isn’t like different plans couldn’t make agonizing wearing encounters. Be that as it may, not this one – once more, full clarification with pictures is in the review.

In the long run I found that getting a solid match has become simpler as my wrist got somewhat more extensive. The watch top of the SBGC001 is substantial and thick thus it tends to wobble around if the fit isn’t at any rate 80% great. In the event that you like wearing your watches free, or possibly don’t mind in the event that they are, indeed, this watch likely still won’t work for you as its significant weight will be hysterically pulling and winding the wristband, making the watch uncomfortably wobble from one edge to the next of the wrist.

I keep up my unique assessment that this watch preferably ought to have come with an instrument free miniature change fasten. I additionally said and keep up that all extravagance watches fitted with metal wristbands should consolidate some sort of an instrument free miniature change into their fastens. I have seen Citizen and Zodiac sort out very smart methods of designing little, basic and dainty miniature changes into their catches and I’d love to see Grand Seiko surrender this retro jabber penetrated fasten for good in all its offerings.


The unobtrusive sunburst-completed champagne dial and every one of its components I am totally infatuated with right up ’til today. It is refreshingly brilliant without having the in-your-face energy of a white dial. It is classy and rich and works with most a wide range of clothing. The hands and lists proceed to a lot of capture everyone’s attention however. They are totally brilliant and better than 99% of the quality I’ve seen on watches underneath $25k in the course of the last number of years. Interestingly, each factor keeps on saying something with a similar extent after this time: the significant thickness of the files and hands (!) that one can acknowledge with the unaided eye, the amazingly done mirror clean on the top surfaces, and the laser-sharp inclines and focuses are on the whole grand, really.

I don’t remember any event – not to mention repeating situation – when I’ve had issues perusing this watch, aside from totally dark murkiness. Once there is a little – or a ton – of light, the cleaned slopes on the primary hands make it simple to peruse the time with extraordinary precision and initially. The little sub-dials aren’t better than different chronographs – however aren’t more regrettable all things considered. I actually like the shading composed warmth blued hands for all the signs of the chronograph, conveniently isolated from the principle time indications.

The power save sign I depend on often, in any event double seven days, when I don’t wear the watch for a day or more. It’s only incredible to realize that the watch actually has a day or a greater amount of intensity hold when getting it when venturing out from home. The GMT I for one quit utilizing so frequently – now the – 9-hour distinction among CET and LA-time is all in my mind – yet I do set the GMT up as a home-time reference when I travel a couple or more timezones away.

The date bit me in the arse once when I neglected to adapt to a non-tallied 31 (which the watch represented in any case since it is a standard date, not a yearly or ceaseless schedule) and I should purchase another month to month pass for public vehicle – and I didn’t. This truly was more my shortcoming than the watch’s, as the date is anything but difficult to set with the bouncing hour setting of the principle hour hand – you can do this ceaselessly the watch or disturbing the moment sign or the synchronized seconds.

Speaking of which, a most dark marker of a movement’s refinement I discovered to be the accompanying. Given my grieved over the top compulsive psyche, I like the moment hand to arrive at brief marker when the seconds hand understands 60 – not 20, or 45 or whatever. On a side note I have even seen endless video and banner advertisements by significant brands where their watches read 31 seconds or 25 seconds or whatever, however the moment hand was set dead on brief marker – it annoys me right up ’til the present time. In this way, I found that on numerous developments in the event that you set the moment hand to the moment marker and you press the crown in to begin the hacking development with the seconds more than 60, it will really require 15-25 seconds for the moment hand’s wheels to work accurately thus the moment hand really won’t be driven for a specific number of seconds, along these lines disturbing the ideal synchronization among seconds and minutes.

With the Grand Seiko Spring Drive Chronograph SBGC001 setting this is amazingly simple, as there is a lot more tight connection that permits me to set things up appropriately, start the watch and all will be well. I have ended up taking a gander at the watch on open vehicle or in a line or any place and respecting how the running seconds sign at the 9 o’clock sub-dial disregarded the top marker and the moment hand’s excessively sharp end pointed snap blast in the marker. Better believe it, I surmise I should look for help.

Accuracy & Tactile Stuff

Accuracy of the Grand Seiko 9R86 Spring Drive development is excellent. Seiko calls the 9R86 “by a wide margin the world’s most exact chronograph driven by a mainspring” and like most specialized cases the Japanese make, this also is nearer to being valid, than if the Swiss had said it (grieved, not heartbroken – however it is genuine they have improved lately with their elevated cases on tourbillons and such). This specific SBGC001 I found to acquire a couple of moments each couple of weeks. In the event that I synchronize it with a reference time, I have at any rate 2 strong long stretches of getting brief pass on the sub-seconds inside one moment to the reference time – really surprising stuff. Seiko has likewise dispatched what I review to be the 9R96, which is basically a similar development yet with yet more painstakingly picked quartz controllers – and on the off chance that you just raised an eyebrow or two reasoning “wait, this has quartz in it?!” at that point you haven’t read the two articles I connected to above… so proceed to peruse them now!

I utilize the chronograph sporadically, however I really dominate at either fail to begin it at the ideal time (like at the earliest reference point of an excursion, not a couple of hours into it) or to check it toward the end (and not a couple of hours after appearance), but rather this is my shortcoming and not the watch’s. The pushers are anything but difficult to screw down, they lock and work through the strings easily and with a consoling vibe right up ’til today. The monstrous snap when beginning the section haggle grip prepared chronograph is a delight – as is the entirely smooth breadth of the chronograph and sub-seconds hands. Because of the vertical grip there is no terrible leap to the focal seconds when the chronograph is begun. The 30-minute counter seizes the finish of every moment and the 12-hour counter loans yet more prominent usefulness to the chronograph.

A unusual detail I’ve seen on so numerous Grand Seikos is the way the crown is introduced as it were so when it is in a bad way down and made sure about the GS logo on it is topsy turvy. I have no clue about why that is, however don’t bother, since in the course of the most recent year and a half the strings released a spot and now the GS logo is topsy turvy in addition to about 30°. For the record, this is from incidental use and with no constrained fixing of the screw-down crown. The 100m water obstruction rating implies never during the responsibility for watch was I stressed over it under any conditions. I am no jumper (scuba-or something else), however it is ideal to realize I can do anything I desire without agonizing over the watch self-destructing, spilling or such.

It likewise feels unshakable, both the wristband, the case, whatever moves, turns or should remain flawless – everything feels unbending and consoling, and in light of the considerable load as well as due to how things fit together.

Zaratsu Polishing versus Every day Wear

One of the delights to strong, top notch hardened steel is that it can get hammered without presently building up the visual attributes of a dog’s supper. On the Grand Seiko Spring Drive Chronograph SBGC001 the case and arm band are probably the most flawlessly completed I have ever seen on a watch at this value point (and very above it too). I wouldn’t think I’m especially blundering or hard on my watches, yet I don’t keep an eye on by the same token. I’ll either keep a watch in its container in unblemished, unworn condition or wear it as I ordinarily would – I for one don’t see the highlight taking the watch out into this present reality and afterward going nuts over the watch coming in contact with regular objects.

With this prominent, my SBGC001 shows a considerable amount of wear on the wristband, case, and bezel. There are stages to how a watch wears: there’s the moment that it’s all new and wonderfully gleaming and awesome all around. At that point the primary scratch shows up, and afterward a couple of something else. There comes a point, and this is the saddest part in my brain, when the watch actually has the attributes of another watch yet is scratched up. Things just improve from here, as the watch begins to create what I surmise we could call patina. As all typically obvious surfaces show wear, the more modest or bigger defects at this point don’t stand apart so much and the watch takes another and more affable look – that of a watch that’s been worn, as all watches ought to be.

I am not a devotee of resurfacing in light of the fact that I esteem sharp edges considerably more exceptionally than I do glossy or wonderful surfaces. I additionally have definitely no trust at all in any Grand Seiko (or something else) administration focus and their capacity to dependably reproduce the profound clean on the carries, for instance. I’ve seen a lot of terrible completing and sparkly yet lopsided surfaces not to like the thick, profound, yet worn look of the drags on this watch – and I recommend that you, when all is said and done, on the off chance that you truly demand, check resurfacing out on a quality watch (since cleaning poo won’t yield terrific outcomes worth judging) that you presently don’t wear or hold so beyond a reasonable doubt, just to see the contrast between a restored surface and a unique one.

A truly smart thought then again is washing your watch often. Simply under running water from the tap is fine – however a super sonic cleaning of the wristband (or the case with the development appropriately eliminated) in a workshop will yield far superior outcomes. Right up ’til the present time I’m stunned by the distinction in this watch between when it looks clean and when it actually is clean.

General Comments On Ownership

To this day the Grand Seiko Spring Drive Chronograph SBGC001 is the watch I go after frequently when picking a watch to wear for the afternoon. The comfort, dependability, solidness, looks, and tender loving care render it the most fulfilling bundle – I realize that it generally will be brilliantly exact, I know the subtleties of the case and dial will keep on astonishing me should I have a second to look at it, and the general feel and comfort is grand too. I wouldn’t deny a titanium form significant wear-time either, as I might suspect the lone way this watch could be improved is by adding softness – and a friggin’ device free miniature adjust.

A Note On The Non-Seiko Grand Seiko Version

This is a really abstract thing so on the off chance that you discover you can’t help contradicting me completely, that’s all cool as well – simply stay cool about it. Seiko has as of late oppressed this piece – whose dial plan and particular yet settled equilibrium I appreciate so a lot – to the non-Seiko-ization-treatment by eliminating the independent Seiko logo from 12 o’clock and moving the Grand Seiko logo from 6 o’clock to its place (really to the 11 o’clock position). This obviously made some unfilled space at 6 o’clock thus they put GMT in red to its place. I think this new “design” is a complete catastrophe, with the adjusted equilibrium of the first piece annihilated. I love the way that the SBGC001 has SEIKO on it and Grand Seiko beneath for it is like the parent company Seiko – energetically and accomplishments – was peering down over the more modest Grand Seiko brand inside it. In more basic terms, Grand Seiko is essential for Seiko and eliminating the last is honestly a haughtiness, best case scenario, (affront to say the least) to the measly moderate Seiko really each and every individual who needs a GS cherishes and possesses. Wouldn’t it be silly if Mercedes-Benz eliminated the Mercedes-Benz logo and name from its AMG items, since it wasn’t select enough for the top of the line in-house skunkworks of AMG? Beneficial thing is that I am certain there are some BNIB (pristine in box) SBGC001s actually out there.

Removing the Seiko marking and jacking costs is Seiko taking two of the most noticeably awful offenses from the Swiss extravagance watch brand handbook: self-aggrandizement and voracious valuing. The Japanese (at a corporate level) act gradually (or as a rule don’t act by any means) with regards to PR and branding… and I assume it took them a decent 10-15 years to handle what the Swiss had been doing since the beginning of the new thousand years and now they figured OK, “it worked for them so we’ll need in too!” The issue is that it had as of now stopped working for the Swiss years back, just obviously not long enough for the Japanese to deal with this change. This is my hypothesis, in view of what I’ve been seeing and getting with Grand Seiko item dispatches and official public statements in late years.

Here’s the critically significant piece. I think the SBGC001’s looks experienced this rebranding in light of the fact that it was done as a component of a cycle the Japanese infrequently ever permit themselves to do: the cycle was devoted not to improving the item but rather to push it through a marking/communications choice. They spoiled it since they have no involvement with doing this – and that’s unequivocally why I like them to such an extent. The SBGC001 was dispatched longer than 10 years prior following quite a while of work on the Spring Drive development and it is a perfection of remarkable plan and designing, being one of the uncommon examples where the dispatch item is as of now immaculate for it is a showcase of all the exertion that was devoted to its creation. In shutting of this tirade, I’ll state that I wouldn’t have gotten this new form (the SBGC201G) regardless of whether it was the solitary model, just in light of the fact that it looks strange an unequal to me. It isn’t in the same class as it could be.


The key remove message from this I think ought to be that purchasing a watch for its characteristics will give you more noteworthy long-term satisfaction than getting one for the marking, the loftiness, the set of experiences, or the story appended to it. Most hustling themed watches won’t put you in your as a primary concern into a dashing vehicle when you’re riding the metro similarly how purchasing a watch with pointless, over-designed highlights won’t transform you into a combat jumper or celebrated space expert in the market line by the same token. These are plain as day. What isn’t so explicitly clear however, except if you’ve encountered the comparison first-handedly, is the contrast between a very much made watch and a particularly made watch. The more flawless, great subtleties there are, the more positively constructed the case and wristband are, the better the neatness, the less futile and the more advantageous highlights a watch has, the more you’ll go after it years not far off – and the later you’ll want to relinquish it.

I’ll get done with what I said toward the start of my unique review: “The Grand Seiko Spring Drive Chronograph SBGC001, completely, all things considered out of the crate, is actually the bundle of plan, development, usefulness, innovation, precision, and worth that at least one significant Swiss brands ought to in any event be attempting to offer.” After year and a half of proprietorship and customary wear, I particularly keep up this assessment – with my solitary expansion to it being my anxiety with the Grand Seiko of today with its inexorably aggressive valuing and honestly inept non-Seiko-Grand-Seiko rebranding.