The Grand Seiko SBGA231G from their Sport Collection isn’t the primary model that comes to mind when considering their watches. Maybe it is the exceptionally competitive market for jumping watches, though in the market, everything being equal, the Grand Seikos appear to do really well. So can any anyone explain why we don’t see very little discussion about the Grand Seiko SBGA231G or SBGA229G for instance? Is it since its looks are excessively near those jumping watches from Switzerland? We should have a more critical gander at the SBGA231.
Grand Seiko SBGA231G
The SBGA231G is the ‘Grand Seiko’ update of the ‘Seiko’ SBGA031. This implies that after Seiko and Grand Seiko were isolated two years prior, all models got another dial that just specifies ‘Grand Seiko’ rather than the twofold naming (‘Seiko’ and ‘Grand Seiko’) they had previously. The SBGA231G is the titanium partner of the tempered steel Grand Seiko SBGA229G (some time ago SBGA029G).
Let me start by disclosing to you that I am not a fanatic of titanium. It is one reason I didn’t accepting the renowned Grand Seiko ‘Snowflake’ SBGA211 . It is too light-weight for me, as I like a watch to have some presence (in weight) on my wrist. All things considered, with 137 grams, this SBGA231G isn’t amazingly light-weight by the same token. The steel reference SBGA229G weighs 201 grams, so that is a significant lump without a doubt. As a comparison, a Rolex Submariner Date 116610LN weighs approx. 155 grams. On the wrist, the titanium Grand Seiko SBGA231G wears and feels sufficiently considerable on the off chance that you have similar issues with titanium as I have.
Now that I referenced the Submariner at any rate, there’s one thing that I frequently hear when it is about this Grand Seiko SBGA229G and SBGA231G model: it looks pretty darn like the Rolex Submariner. Partly, that is extremely evident and it is doesn’t bode well to reject that it has a great deal of similitudes. Then again, a ton of jumping watches have a comparable look in view of those run of the mill plunging watch highlights. This goes for the Breitling SuperOcean, the Omega Seamaster 300M and Planet Ocean, maybe even the Blancpain Fifty-Fathoms too. Nonetheless, the dark uni-directional plunging bezel, the crown monitors, the dark dial and white hour markers (with rings) of this specific Grand Seiko SBGA231G are surely somewhat like those from the Rolex Submariner. Is that something terrible? All things considered, it doesn’t merit a cost for creativity maybe, however all these ‘Submariner’ highlights do make this a utilitarian watch (both the Rolex and Grand Seiko). On the off chance that you’re not annoyed by it, there’s definitely no issue. There are additionally enough contrasts and Grand Seiko highlights that make this watch still intriguing and not simply a ‘praise’ to the Submariner. Maybe it is likewise here that the titanium may be a significant factor for the individuals who lean toward a light plunging watch, as Rolex doesn’t offer their Submariner in titanium.
Then there’s the Spring Drive development, obviously. I’ve been clarifying crafted by the Spring Drive development a couple of times previously, so I propose you read this or this article in the event that you need to have more insights regarding this development. As far as I might be concerned, the Spring Drive development is certainly an or more, as I love its exactness and execution. The consistent ‘electric’ clear of the second hand is consistently a joy to notice. There’s just a single disadvantage to Spring Drive as I would like to think, which is the force hold marker that comes with it. Completely pointless for a self-winding watch. In the event that it demonstrates void, you should wind or wear it. On the off chance that it is as yet running, just put it on and it will increment once more. I don’t get the purpose of this pointer except if a watch has a hand-wound development. All things considered, the Spring Drive development as such is only magnificent in my book.
Where this watch contrasts from the vast majority of its competition is the plan of the case and particularly the completing of the case. Grand Seiko utilizes Zaratsu (reflect) cleaning strategies for their cases, which brings about a wonderful sparkle. It is something I appreciate most with my own Seiko Marinemaster and Grand Seiko Hi-Beat. The completion looking into the issue is essentially astonishing and leaves its immediate competition a long ways behind. The drawback is that a plunging watch is likely additionally going to be utilized as jumping (or instrument) watch, so it will get a few scratches. Indeed, even the watch we have here for audit has seen some legitimate use. What’s more, that shows, which can be annoying for the individuals who need to keep their watches in perfect conditions consistently. Obviously, the Grand Seiko SBGA231G can be revamped during administration, and on the off chance that it disturbs you that much you could likewise contemplate whether you shouldn’t utilize a more reasonable watch for jumping purposes and simply utilize this one for being pretty. A few group assume that titanium is more scratch safe than steel, however you will get it scratched simply during use. So you definitely should choose for titanium in the event that you love the light-weight factor and maybe the more obscure shade of the material, in any case the steel SBGA229G is comparably fine (and a €1000 cheaper).
The titanium case doesn’t have a presentation back, which is a pity, as I like to see their type 9R65 development at work. Be that as it may, perfectionists may differ and get a kick out of the chance to see the case shut. The force hold of the Grand Seiko type 9R65 is 72 hours and it has a precision of approx. 1 second of deviation each day. Obviously, this watch comes with a screw-down crown. No artistic bezel for this Grand Seiko, however a high cleaned steel bezel, much the same as the MM300 SBDX001 and SBDX017 for instance. The high cleaned finish may make you think it is artistic however, yet it isn’t.
As I previously referenced, some dial components are common for jumpers’ watches. What’s not so common is the degree of finish that Grand Seiko does with their dials. Wonderfully cleaned hour markers and GS logo, brushed hands and everything is checked and applied by hand. The solitary thing I don’t care for about this dial is the force hold marker. In any case, I don’t care for it on any of the Grand Seiko Spring Drive models, including the Snowflake. It ‘breaks’ the dial excessively and makes it all in all too jumbled. The date is situated at 3 o’clock in differentiating colors, which means the plate is white and the printing is dark. Simply the manner in which I like it, for what it’s worth obviously better decipherable this route than on a dark circle with white printing. Stylishly I get it that it is more pleasant when things are coordinating. I wouldn’t have see any problems to have no date by any stretch of the imagination, frankly, yet it is kinda practical for day by day use.
The house of prayer hands are brushed and loaded up with Lumibrite, (Grand)Seiko’s own iridescent compound. It has likewise been applied to the hour markers on the dial. My Seiko and Grand Seiko watches are the best radiant watches in my assortment, so no analysis here. I love the gold tone GS and Grand Seiko logos on the dial at 12 o’clock, it gives a pleasant difference with the high contrast. At 6 o’clock, simply over the rectangular hour marker, there’s the pointer of the 200 meters of water opposition. Slight above, you will likewise peruse that this Grand Seiko SBGA231G is controlled by a Spring Drive movement.
The arm band on this Grand Seiko SBGA231G looks fundamentally the same as the other Grand Seiko wristbands. Three columns of brushed connections and the middle connection as two cleaned interfaces in the middle. So altogether, there are 5 lines of connections. It is very much like the cutting edge Omega Speedmaster arm band plan. I’m not actually a fanatic of its style truth be told (the Speedmaster arm band and the Grand Seiko wristband), as I might suspect it would be a lot simpler on the eyes when everything was simply brushed. The quality is awesome however, and the degree of finish is incredible too. There’s a simple framework in the catch for expanding the wristband in the event that you need to wear it over your jumping suit, or simply resize it a piece during blistering late spring days for instance. It works extremely simple, yet the framework looks somewhat modest, frankly. A similar expansion framework can be found on the wristband of the Marinemaster 300 and where I previously thought that it was modest on that watch (with a retail cost of approx. 2500 Euro at that point), it’s not improving when the retail cost of the watch is 7200 Euro.
Make no mix-up, this Grand Seiko SBGA231G is much the same as some other Grand Seiko an incredible piece of designing. The completing is mind blowing, yet it feels a piece as I am rehashing myself again and again with regards to Grand Seiko. I likewise must be reasonable here: I feel that Grand Seiko is (still) a great deal of value for the money, yet the measure of bucks expected to get one of their watches has been expanding in the previous few years. The retail cost of 7200 Euro for this titanium jumper is as yet under the 7850 Euro sticker price of a Rolex Submariner Date or a titanium Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M (7900 Euro), however it is drawing near. There’s no uncertainty at the top of the priority list that this Grand Seiko SBGA231G couldn’t measure up to both of these two. Nonetheless, for 7200 Euro a fired bezel would have been overall quite the expansion framework in the catch could utilize a redesign too, particularly compared to the two different watches referenced previously. I figure I would go for the steel SBGA229G form of this watch myself, for a 1000 Euro, I could live with the 64 grams extra weight.
More data through the authority Grand Seiko .