Dreyfuss & Co . is generally known for more spending plan themed watches, yet throughout the long term certain select models have seen the company venturing up their game a touch. Practically out of the blue came this quite decent, around $1,200, vintage-pilot-style watch they call the Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 reference ‎DGS00164/19 restricted version. In general, I like this watch a ton given its pricepoint and plan – however it isn’t without its peculiarities. Likewise eminent is language and phrasing utilized on the brand’s site that ought to presumably be changed – particularly in the event that they are endeavoring to pull in a more complex watch purchaser audience.

The Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 depends on the plan of early flight watches, and you can see comparable plans in watches that are significantly more costly. So this is from various perspectives among the most reduced estimated methods of getting a watch with this style (think Zenith). Here, that implies a semi-shiny dark dial with raised adapted Arabic numeral hour markers that are painted with a fair degree of luminant. You likewise have quite decently expansive hour and moment hands which are appropriately measured and together make for a fantastic degree of clarity. It likewise helps that the sapphire precious stone over the dial is AR-coated on the two sides which gets rid of a ton of awful glare (goodness, how I despise glare on watches…).


Enthusiasts will acknowledge different plan choices, for example, the absence of a date window, and aficionados of “traditional” physically twisted watches will like that this is hand-twisted variant of a development series that is commonly introduced in a programmed winding execution (when I saw it previously).

The name of the watch, the dial of the watch, and the development in the watch all have the “Calibre 39” name assignment that will permit nobody to fail to remember that within this Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 is undoubtedly a Swiss Eterna-made Caliber 39 4Hz (28,800bph) programmed development with 65 hours of intensity save. That is around more than two days between when you need to wind it. You can see the modestly alluring development through the show window on the back of the case. Actually, I would have far favored a programmed development as I’m not a specific devotee of physically twisted developments. However, a few people are, and for them this may be an especially decent choice.

As a physically wound watch, you should wind the crown consistently, of course, and in the Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 that isn’t the most lovely experience. I’ve took care of two of the watches, so I think it is an issue with the whole collection. There are two issues, however neither ought to be considered a major issue. First is the reality the screw-down crown (which is useful for water-obstruction) is difficult to screw down whenever it is unscrewed. Essentially, the stringing on the crown stem doesn’t effectively get into the case, and I for one need to “play” with it considerably for it appropriately catch and screw down.



Not screwing down the crown is unfortunate for the development as water (counting dampness) and residue can enter. Also, the unstable crown is defenseless to harm in the event that it is hit in the incorrect manner when it isn’t in a bad way down. Another issue identified with winding is that for reasons unknown this type 39 development style has a soft, practically missing criticism when physically winding the development. It’s not dreadful or anything, but rather it falls somewhat shy of what I commonly anticipate from a nice Swiss movement.



The Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 (which, as of composing, isn’t spoken to on Dreyfuss & Co.’s own site) looks alluring and, all the more significantly, is comfortable on the wrist. In the event that my main thing from the watch is the dial, my second main thing is the situation. In steel and 45mm wide, the case has a twofold bezel plan with the inward one being cleaned and the external one being brushed, similar to the remainder of the case. The case shape is, generally, bowl-molded, which implies that it is smaller where it sits on your wrist, and that causes it to feel more modest than it is. You have a pleasant help style brand logo on the simple to-grasp crown, and the unmistakable hauls are given a decent shape just as the additional detail of outside tie screws.

Attached to the case is an appealing gator style dark calfskin pilot style tie with contrast sewing. Like some other pilot watches, (for example, the Pilot’s Watch Chronograph created by IWC), the tie tightens about an inch down past the case, which is both alluring and makes for added comfort when on the wrist. While little of the real plan of the Series 1924 Caliber 39 is unique to Dreyfuss & Co., this is a cost competitive, alluring contribution that conveys a style many individuals are looking for.

I disagree with some language utilized by the brand which I feel is, at any rate, deceiving. The watch dial just as the Dreyfuss & Co. site utilize the term “hand-made” to portray the watches. The term “hand-made” infers something about the construction of the parts, while they are inferring that the watch is generally “hand-assembled.” They kind of explain this in the language on their site, however for a watch with parts that are totally machined (not that there is anything amiss with that) and no hand-decoration, I think that its improper to have the term utilized on the site, not to mention utilized on the genuine dial of the watch (where “Hand-Made Switzerland” is composed under the logo).

According to Dreyfuss & Co., every one of their exclusively serialized watches is hand-gathered, and the chronic number is put on the back of the case. Dreyfuss & Co. educated me that this watch is a restricted release of 250 pieces, yet I assume you’d simply need to realize that given the simple chronic number assignment on the rear of the case. Likewise on the back of the case – rather than demonstrating the water opposition – is the term “ Seafarer .” right away, I had no clue about what this implied until I found it on the brand’s site. Geeky or not, what I saw stunned me. Dreyfuss & Co. proposes that all watches that bear the “Seafarer Standard” are “totally waterproof, impenetrable to water.” Of course, that doesn’t apply to 18k gold watches…


So for what reason is this stunning? All things considered, above all else, not even the world’s most genuine plunge watches can profess to be in a real sense “waterproof.” That is a genuine case that water won’t ever enter the case. Watches accordingly will in general utilize the term “water resistant,” alongside a marker of how water-safe they are, (for example, 50, 100, 300, 1000 meters, and so forth) Despite the fact that Dreyfuss & Co. appears to feel comfortable calling their watches “totally impenetrable to water… setting new guidelines for the watch industry.” Of course, this is unthinkable, and the Series 1924 isn’t even a plunge watch – and my estimate is that it has 100 meters of water obstruction. I don’t know why the company thought it was a savvy thought to draft such exaggeration on their site, which to me appears to simply welcome controversy.

My surmise is that regardless of the real water opposition of the watches, Dreyfuss & Co. realizes that couple of individuals really bring their watches into situations that will have water pressure harm them. In spite of the fact that with this specific watch there is a decent possibility somebody will leave the crown unscrewed and plunge into the pool. On the off chance that something like this were to occur, Dreyfuss & Co. may basically find that doing a guarantee fix or offering another watch is a decent answer for the issue. That ordinarily satisfies the consumer. This is one of those cost/advantage investigation circumstances where the likely prize of having unreasonable (putting it softly) claims on your site exceeds the cost of curing infringement of that guarantee when consumers approach the brand with issues. I’ll let you make of that what you like.

Given a portion of the absurd things I’ve seen from substantially more costly watches and since it seems like Dreyfuss & Co. is welcoming individuals to get free fixes, I take the entirety of this with a decent measure of humor. Indeed, the brand is composing complete bologna on their site, however I consider it to be more amusing than undermining. However, I do profoundly recommend that the danger of misdirecting fledgling consumers who may get very disturbed should incite the brand to eliminate this language from their site and reexamine their advertising introduction as this to me feels like a greeting for issues that can be handily evaded by just being direct about the creation methods and sturdiness of one’s timepieces.


When I was more current to mechanical watches, a watch like the Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 would have likely engaged me a ton. It seems like a respectable measure of watch for the cash, in a truly hot style that is hard to track down at this cost. The Swiss Eterna type 39 development (however I lean toward automatics) would be a good selling point, and who can beat a brand who is fundamentally encouraging the world in a watch to consumers realizing that on the off chance that they complain about fix needs – it is in the brand’s wellbeing to just fulfill them? Cost for the Dreyfuss & Co. Series 1924 Caliber 39 reference ‎DGS00164/19 is £1,000 (which as of season of composing is about $1,250 USD). dreyfussandco.com

Necessary Data

>Brand: Dreyfuss & Co.

>Model: Series 1924 Caliber 39 reference ‎DGS00164/19

>Price: £1,000

>Size: 45mm wide

>Would commentator by and by wear it: Sure, as an early “nice watch” acquisition.

>Friend we’d recommend it to first: More fledgling watch sweetheart simply getting into watches searching for this kind of vintage pilot watch style and needing a good, but physically twisted, movement.

>Best normal for watch: Manages to have a sufficiently composed, provocative look that feels truly comfortable on the wrist. Entirely intelligible dial helps too.

>Worst normal for watch: Poor screw-down crown joining with case, and winding feels soft. Language on dial and that utilized by the brand is misdirecting enough to cause in excess of a couple of consumers to feel uncomfortable.