I’d been quick to go active with the Boldr Expedition since the time I saw it dispatch on Kickstarter. I swayed on whether to back it at that point, however with numerous alternatives to browse at that point, I let it slide. Having put in half a month with it as a component of my every day revolution I can say this: I ought to have pulled the trigger the first occasion when I considered doing so.

I’ve saw I’m beginning to sound extremely repetitive with regards to these microbrand watches. Typically, I’ll get going by saying I didn’t anticipate a lot and afterward close on a positive note. Perhaps I’ve become distrustful in my mature age. Or on the other hand perhaps I’m simply sensible. Having chipped away at all sides of creation, I realize that it is so difficult to make something enigmatically fascinating at a competitive cost. In any case, when it went to the Boldr Expedition, I had uncommonly exclusive requirements. For probably the first time, those assumptions were met, yet not in the manner in which I’d envisioned they would be.

I’d imagined a vanilla reaction to an item that had provoked my curiosity with its strange shape. It is reasonable for say that I figured it would be “okay” and that’s it. While I was positively pulled in to its outline, the completely brilliant dial of the Eiger model I chose for audit, and the twin crowns, there were, from the absolute first second, a few components that gave me cause for concern. Notwithstanding, those concerns demonstrated unwarranted. What’s more, here’s why…


The Expedition arrangement offers five dial alternatives. I decided to audit the Eiger. It is the one in particular that utilizes various colors for the dial and bezel. The other four choices have glowing hour markers, yet the Eiger goes for a completely lumed dial. The actual format is not a huge deal. There are no startling embellishments or surprising components. Thusly, I had been unfortunate that the dials would glance dull, all things considered, yet the shockingly little breadth of this piece (estimating a compact 41mm across) implies that the dials come off pleasingly cleaned up and consummately proportioned.

In actuality, this more modest than-anticipated measurement has a ton to do with why I like this watch to such an extent. Instead of coming across as pared-back or meager, the case extents wed expertly with a dial set-up of surprising profundity and subtlety. The inward pivoting bezel (worked by the screw-down crown at 2 o’clock) has a sense of safety in its turn. The printed high level of the bezel sits on top of a chamfered part ring that inclines down to meet the dial. These two components are isolated by a little hole, that gives this showcase a welcome feeling of over-construction. Essentially, nothing about this moderate watch appears cheap.

Those crowns

Talking of modest, I was concerned those crowns would be disappointing. On press photographs, the orange stripe on the 2 o’clock crown didn’t look engaging. All things considered, notwithstanding, it is conveniently applied and looks probably as impeccable as possible. The stunning, raised “B” logo on the time crown at 4 o’clock is well-executed.

Case size

I’ve referenced the 41mm distance across. While that doesn’t sound unfathomably little, the 14mm thickness pulls a prank on your eyes. I can’t move away from the word “compact”. It is, as I would see it, the ideal word to depict this watch. While 14mm may sound bold on paper, the watch wears tiny. It is, beyond question, the thing I like most about this watch. Had this plan been acknowledged in 43mm, this comfort would have in a split second vanished. The 2 and 4 o’clock crowns further diminish the visual effect of the watch on the wrist.

The finish and shape

Now, on the off chance that you disdain uniform, media-impacted surface completions, you won’t appreciate this case. As far as I might be concerned, nonetheless, Boldr could not have picked a superior course for the Expedition arrangement. As device watches, this dark outside is ideal. We see a tad of clean working on this issue back, yet I’ll get to that momentarily.

First, I need to cause to notice the state of the case. Indeed, I’m slamming a similar drum by and by. The wearability of this watch is brilliant. Why? Those essentially non-existent carries add next to no mass to the outline. The straight spring bars, which rub facing level surfaces of the case at 12 and 6 o’clock make flipping this thing onto different lashes a fantasy. To such an extent, I did precisely that. I love elastic lashes however I didn’t adore the one that went ahead this watch. The clasp was respectable, however the EPDM elastic is a genuine residue magnet. I likewise found the plan excessive. I stuck this model on a retro-styled earthy colored calfskin tie from Nero Biglia and it came to life.

Originally, if memory serves, these watches went ahead a sort of material lash with metal eyelets on the ties. A material choice is as yet accessible in the shop for only 39 bucks. I preferred those all the more however I truly can’t recommend sufficient the appearance of this thing on a decent quality tan cowhide lash. As somewhat of a fanatic for keeping watches on their unique ties, this amazed me. I as of late did likewise with my Breitling Aerospace with extraordinary outcomes. I surmise my position on plan devotion is disappearing as I further increment my wearing revolution. I’d encourage you to try as a result.

Naff yet pleasantly executed case back

I’m a major aficionado of very much done case backs. I like a shut case back with a decent plan. What I like significantly more, is a decent plan expertly executed. Here we have the last without the previous. The nature of the case back is truly top-rack, however the design… Well, as I would like to think, it’s a piece naff. I would much rather have seen a mountain range, or crossed pick-tomahawks, or something more artful.

Even as a devoted outdoorsman once in a while a long way from his strolling boots, the impression theme didn’t land with me. A little yet genuine analysis that not the slightest bit diminished my satisfaction in this watch. It is simply something I might want Boldr to develop next time the expedition gets an update. Furthermore, that’s is something the brand should consider. Not on the grounds that it “needs” it, yet rather on the grounds that it merits it. It’s too great to even consider leaving untouched.

Excellent lume

So, the central issue: How great is all that lume? Conjuring contemplations of ten-buck-Timexes, the Boldr Expedition Eiger had me stressed. Could a brand charging around €500 for a watch of such character truly have spent enough on the dial to pull it off? See above for the appropriate response. Top stuff. I’m truly intrigued. So intrigued, indeed, that I went through ten minutes on all fours in the latrine of my office (the solitary room dim enough for this shot in the day) to demonstrate it to you.

This picture has not been altered and was given utilizing a three-second openness (to make sure you know there’s no dishonesty at play here). The reality I put in almost no time scrabbling around on a (public) washroom floor for this watch demonstrates what amount getting a decent shot of the lume in real life intended to me. I haven’t been so familiar with a washroom floor since the time I dropped in Frankie & Bennies in the wake of breathing in a pitcher of ale and a twofold burger. I figured out how to smother those nerve racking recollections for your advantage. Also, you’re more than welcome.

Is hand lume necessary?

One strange point raised, be that as it may, must be the lume on the hands. That is to say, is it at all important with a completely lumed dial? For show homogeny in low-light conditions, I would say not. I’m almost certain Boldr left the lume on these hands so they could impart them to the Matterhorn model. The seconds hand with the orange tip, then, appears to be equivalent to the Sinai/Everest/Rushmore versions. That’s a keen sufficient cost-persuaded choice, however on the off chance that the Expedition Eiger II at any point hits the racks, I need to see skeletonized hands to take advantage of that radiant dial.


Well, it is extensively certain. The watch case is amazing. I love the dial. The crowns are professional and a delight to utilize. The case back execution is extraordinary yet the plan dreary. I’d certainly turn the standard lash for the present, however regret that the clasp is excessively wide for tightened options. The case furnishes the Sellita SW200-1 with 20,000A/m of attractive opposition. The carry to-haul length is simply 46mm and the watch takes 20mm lashes (the clasp is a similar width). Also, the cost for the Boldr Expedition Eiger? $599. Become familiar with Boldr Supply co. .

Follow me on Instagram